sprint at Fliesstext10
contributions until 10 Your proposal and valuable prizes
of Dorle Kopetzky from Pfaffenhofen on myheimat sprint at Fliesstext10
The respective 10 best entries in each category will be selected by a jury and during the final events in the participating cities, Eichstätt, Ingolstadt, Neuburg, Pfaffenhofen Vohburg of 10 to 24 October 2010 before an audience present. The three best entries will receive valuable cash and prizes including the sponsor Expert market. Prizes worth € 7000 are awarded.
Until 10 August can anyone - man, woman and child - told Upload and true stories from the region 10 (including the districts of Eichstätt, Neuburg-Schrobenhausen, production facilities and the independent city of Ingolstadt) on the website www.fliesstext10.de and so the competition for the best photos, best video, best sound - call, text and review the best children's contribution. And who is interested now, the look on the pictured on the website map of the Region 10: This is full of large and small colored dots that show the selected papers - like those of Arnold circulation - and also show which city or any county Most storytellers houses (see photo below). And Steffen Kopetzky, the artistic director of the festival, says: "place on the map is still there, there's stories still determined to win lots of prizes and only those who participated. We look forward to more contributions to the final sprint. "
TOTAL IMAGE DINGS
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Your Song Lyrical Dance Costume
MYTH OF JESUS (Part 2: Living the life of Galilee)
[PART 1: "The invisible man"]
tell you that he was the son of God. Others believe Jesus Christ to have a rabbi, whose lives have to be formed later legends.
But what was really at that time? Was Jesus God or man?
but sometimes we play both versions one by one and see how these two theories are plausible.
SAY WHAT?
Jesus said to have come to spread a divine message, the legend. But he behaved not as clever as you might expect from an omniscient God. He would just have to say anything then no one could know. He would have - at least for later generations - left a convincing proof of his divinity.
But his alleged statements contain nothing that would not have a normal human being 2000 years ago can tell. God insists in his new revelation on his view that the earth is flat (eg, Luke 4:5, Revelation 7:1, Hebrews 1:10).
The earth is not flat and not the center of the universe, it is several billion years old and revolves around the sun, which is of a trillion stars. If Jesus would have said something like - What did the damn skeptical, rational's Pagans for eyes made if a statement would have the Bible can be proven scientifically later!
But no, it spreads rather that people who are sick, blind or disabled, possessed by "demons" and "devils" and that it is healthy when one prays them hard enough. Thus, he advanced the then-medicine for 0 years!
Suppose Jesus was God come, and to spread the message of his love on earth.
it finds that it was successful? If he had as an omnipotent God can not people reveal all of the world? Or at least a majority of the people?
are today at least two thirds of the world is not Christian. And while Christianity is everywhere in our region at least in the past, there are many regions of the world where that was not Sun
Let's say God has changed and is now a loving God and not, as before in the Old Testament, a racist who says a certain group of people consider to be sacred and the others. Why he appears in only part of the world in which he had always always been? He wants to be but now instead of just "God of the Israelites," "God of all."
God it was probably better to show only specific people and the way to reveal himself with miracles, for which there are no more witnesses There. And we, the 99.99 ..% of humanity in the history of the so-must believe without miracles?
It does not look as if it was the divine purpose to reveal Himself to all people. Since there'd better's methods. He is God. Equipped with omnipotence, he should manage a halfway decent job. But maybe he wants to reveal not only yes, but the people do something good, because he so loves.
THANK GOD
"16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have eternal life .
17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. "
(John 3:16-17)
Had the son of a loving God is the life of mankind can not improve something obvious?
If our creator could have explained to us, for example, that many diseases caused by poor hygiene be caused (rather than by "vicious", as Jesus says) - can be saved How many millions of lives would have in the past 2000 years
Jesus says, however, exactly? the opposite. He washed it not so with the hands, as we learn in an episode from the Gospel of Matthew (Chapter 15 ). This
come to Jesus and the Pharisees complain that he and his disciples do not wash their hands before eating. Jesus is angry and foul is called the Pharisees hypocrites.
His argument: he washes his hands, perhaps not, the Pharisees rocky but not people who have insulted their parents - which is more serious ...
He comes to the conclusion:
"20 but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile the man." (Matthew 15:20)
But, Jesus, you genius!
WHY YOU SEND ME IN HELL (hell, hell)?
"God is Love"
(1 John 4:8)
God is love and therefore kill his child for us. Thus we some of us do not have to go to hell. But first he has invented the same time with Jesus and presented. Jesus spread the new concept of "hell", while offering a way out of it.
In the Old Testament makes no mention of hell or something similar. Satan there is no ruler of a world full of eternal torment, but keeps (- as we learn in the book of Job -) either on earth or in heaven, in the midst of God's children and the old gentleman.
Only Christ is the idea of eternal punishment after death.
The Old Testament again and again reported sinners, punished by God for their sins directly (and usually kills).
As people but also at that time were not completely stupid, for it would have at some point realized that it is not. Religion needed something new, bigger, to the people and spreading fear.
God kills you immediately, if you sin: Everyone knows from personal experience.
But if the punishment only comes after death, where they can look stupid as any other ...
You are not even a murderer or child molester must. According to Jesus you will go to hell when his brother a "fool" is the name (Matthew 5:22) or insulted the Holy Spirit. In the latter case, a forgiveness of that sin the way, is excluded from the beginning (Mark 3:29, Matthew 12:32). Could This Be Love? ..
NO WONDER
But now, take me, Jesus Christ would have been a normal man, no God, or the like.
A wise rabbi who went about preaching was baptized, told parables, and is added to later legends developed. Most non-religious people can make friends well with this view. But if you take all the miracles of Jesus, biblical biography, then you have already found the historical Jesus?
is so easy, unfortunately not. First, drop off quite a bit of important events that have shaped the character Jesus Christ prevail.
For example:
- The announcement of his birth by an angel
- The Birth of the Virgin Maria
- The star of Bethlehem
- The Birth of the "holy spirit" in the form of a dove at Jesus' baptism
- Satan tries to Jesus in the desert
- Angel "serve" Jesus in the desert
- Apostle to me nothing are you anything everything and leave to follow Jesus that they have just met just
- Jesus spits a blind man's eyes, whereupon he can see again
- The expulsion of "Devils"
- The feeding of the 5000
- The power of the 4000
- Jesus cursed a fig tree because This does not bear fruit (seriously)
- The Transfiguration (Jesus takes two apostles on a mountain begins to light up like crazy and float, appear Moses and Elijah and more nonsense of this kind)
- Jesus Devil conjures up on his desire for men into a herd of pigs, which then fall off a cliff and all die.
- The re-awakening of the dead
- Jesus makes a storm to disappear
- dozens of miracle cures
- Jesus runs on water
- The Apostle Peter is asked by Jesus to catch a fish in whose mouth are a coin for their stamp tax should. Prompt
happened just that - turning water into wine
- Jesus predicted that Judas betrays him and slandered him Peter and
- The Resurrection
TAUFTOUR
What remains? A few acts, places and names that say something about the historical Christ.
His mother should have been called Mary, he should have lived in Nazareth, a carpenter who worked and been baptized by John the Baptist be. But are reliable biographical information?
Let's start with John the Baptist. About which there are historical records, for example, the Jewish historian Josephus, who reports to John as a Jewish rebel, Jesus mentioned in this report but not a word.
to this but according to the Gospels, John have recognized the divinity of Christ and worshiped him. If that were true, that would have meant John followers would spontaneously become Christians, but recognize when their cult leader a man as God's son.
"29 The next day John saw Jesus coming to him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which bears the sins of the world [...]
34 ! And I saw it bare record, that this is God's Son. "
(John 1:29, 34)
But there are no reports or other reports on trailer a Jesus Christ from the first half of the first century, while supporters of John Taufbewegung are occupied.
MARIA JESUS!
What we know about the family of Jesus?
learn the earliest Gospel of Mark we hardly know anything about Joseph and Mary. Nothing about a virgin birth or the prophecy through an angel.
The story begins with John the Baptist. The family of Jesus first appeared on the third chapter, where Jesus denied his still nameless brothers and his mother and called in a good cult leader, his followers as the true family style.
"31 And there was his mother and his brothers stood outside and sent to him and called him.
32 And the people sat around him. And They said to him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren without seek for thee
33 And he answered them and said. Who is my mother and my brothers?
34 And he looked round about on the disciples, who sat in a circle, and said, Behold my mother and my brothers
35 For whoever does the will of God, who is my brother and my sister and my mother ".
(Mark 3:31-35)
throughout Mark's Gospel, Mary's name is mentioned only once, as is Jesus' son of Mary ". Much more we learn about Maria here .
is not only in the later Gospels of Matthew and Luke to the Virgin Mary in Luke's Gospel, she also meets an angel in a dream -. appears in Matthew the angel but her husband Joseph.
In John's Gospel, Jesus is with his mother at a wedding party. She asks him for a favor, after which Jesus asks his mother what he had really to do with her.
"1 And on the third day was a marriage in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there
2 Jesus and his. disciples were also invited to the wedding.
3 And since there was Gebrach wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine.
4 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with you? My hour has not yet come. "
(John 2:1-4)
Otherwise we know nothing about the Virgin Mary. Jesus seems to have not particularly liked. He denied and insulted his mother and recommends to his followers the same.
"26 If anyone comes to me and hate not his father, mother, wife, children, brothers, Sisters, even his own life that can not be my disciple. "
(Luke 14:26)
SAINT MARY
Maria then later acquired more prominence. In the 2nd century writings of several biographies for they invented. is It also reports the Assumption of Mary, to be published in the Gospels said nothing. Although the church such documents are not recorded in the canon, they said at the Assumption a dogma. one doubts a dogma that you can out of the church be thrown. Even if this dogma has no reference to the texts of the Bible. What the Church is always the truth, even when it is complete nonsense.
Another dogma Maria explained later to the eternal virgin. Jesus brothers and sisters who are mentioned in the Gospels, are now suddenly supposed to only "cousins". And who does not believe will not be saved. Among Catholics
is the worship of Mary to the point that many of them not only to keep the mother of Jesus, but for the "Mother of God."
suspects to a historical Maria, one must also remove it from the notes of everything supernatural. In the first written Gospel of Mark, however, is nothing unusual about her, said nothing about their virginity or the announcement of his birth by an angel. This is a story that was not written later.
(or earlier, but in other religions, but this in a later part of this series more.)
that remains is the fact that she was said to be married to Joseph and their children to have lived in Nazareth. True because at least that?
HE'S A REAL NOWHERE MAN, SITTING IN HIS NOWHERE LAND
The city of Nazareth for the first time in the Gospels (between 70-110 AD) mentioned in writing.
Not in the Old Testament and other writings to the year 70, not in Josephus, the Jewish historian from the late 1st Century, or his historian colleagues.
This is the territory of the former province of Galilee puny and was about 10% of the area of today's Netherlands. The Talmud - extensive accentuation of the Hebrews at the beginning of the 1st Millennium have been posted - lists in this area over 40 cities, even Josephus 65th One of them (the city "Japha") is located only 1.5 miles from the present-day Nazareth.
Even Paul, whose letters were written earlier than the Gospels mentioned in his writings, no city Nazareth. It is also not a single map from the lifetime of Jesus or received against the Nazareth was recorded.
In the fourth century traveled Helena, the mother of Constantine, the Christian emperor of Rome, the Holy Land to find the home of their Saviour Jesus Christ. What they found was not very spectacular. A single well, nothing else. Here is two hundred years have previously been a city large enough that they had a synagogue, is said to have taught in the Bible according to Jesus?
As locals from the region of the mother of the Emperor insured, however, have made this well, the Virgin Mary drew water, Helena built a church at this point. Also in the vicinity of a cave, said to have lived in the family of God, they built a church.
Thanks to the two churches was something that was previously only a well and a cave, now a pilgrimage site "Nazareth".
Man eagerly conducted excavations in order to win even more sacred relics. The only thing we found were a few graves. In the Hebrew culture of the time but they buried their dead away from the settlements, because deaths were considered unclean. That makes it even more unlikely that there the "Nazareth" to the Gospels was located. Most likely, people were buried there from surrounding towns, for example, from the nearby Japha.
As Christianity spread, attracted more and more believers, the pilgrimage site and slowly grew into a city. Today, Nazareth has about 65,000 inhabitants.
But that in the first century AD a town called Nazareth did exist, is extremely unlikely. Since no written records or archaeological evidence suggest it can be assumed that Nazareth is just as real as Duckburg, Taka-Tuka-Land, or Gotham City.
Other geographical information about Jesus' life are dubious. In Luke's Gospel reports that Jesus was supposedly born in Bethlehem because a census was carried out under Quirinius. In fact, there was a census under Quirinius in 6 AD
It had no means everyone in his hometown return, as reported in the Bible. The Romans were among the people where so just stayed, and prevented thus ironically a collapse of infrastructure and the outbreak of anarchy.
According to St. Matthew's Gospel finds King Herod (73-4 BC), that a chosen one is born. Because he fears, the holy child could be a danger to him, he decides to have killed all the children in Israel in two years. So Mary and Joseph flee to Egypt with Jesus.
should in fact such a million times the mass murder hardly have taken place without the traditions of which exist. But this is not the Sun . The event is not even mentioned in any of the other Gospels only in passing. The historian Josephus, who wrote a comprehensive biography of Herod mentioned nothing of the sort.
HEY, JOE
also about Jesus' alleged adoptive father Joseph not historical information are delivered. The New Testament gives his profession that Jesus takes over later, with the Greek word "Tekton".
This word was used incorrectly translated as "carpenter." The true but not exactly the case. A Tekton was probably a simple laborer who has done this time and the times. Also with wood tecton have worked, but not only or mainly. It was a profession in the social hierarchy at that time very stood down.
According to the genealogies in Matthew and Luke is Joseph but from the biblical King David (which it probably was not). Although King David is one of the most revered figures in the Old Testament, and there is also a Saviour is announced, which is to be an ancestor of David, there are extensive Hebrew records not a single tree that Josef included - either as a descendant of David, yet as the (adoptive) father of Jesus Christ.
The twelve apostles and the twelve disciples are not historically verifiable. According to the traditions of the Gospels, Jesus had twelve loyal followers. After Jesus' death are eleven of them to Apostles have been called - Judas was not the party.
because 12 more than 11 sounds, we still got a new guy on board. The task of the apostles should be to spread the message of Jesus' deeds and his teachings.
And how did they do that?
Not at all. The traditional biblical studies assumed that two of the apostles have written gospels, namely Matthew and John. As go these days but even the vast majority of the Christian Bible researchers assume that these gospels may be derived from the apostles, one can suppose that is true.
is from any of the twelve men allegedly received anything, no writings of them, nor reports about them, not even a tiny little side note.
there was no historical Jesus is, it's not surprising that he was no twelve disciples and apostles. But if it is a historical Jesus have been, created a movement that was to conquer half the world, he needed it most likely a few more than twelve disciples.
GOD OR NOT
should have if a historical Jesus Christ exists, we know nothing about his life.
Taking everything supernatural, all the wonders of the reports of the Gospels remains low. And even that little is historically dubious.
The most important information to identify a man this time clearly are his ancestors and his birthplace. About Jesus' ancestors, we know nothing. In the Bible two different pedigrees are handed down. Since they contain the Jewish faith extremely important figures such as Adam, Abraham, Isaac and King David's voice, both not very likely. But even if one would correspond to the two family trees of the truth, we still do not know which one. We can therefore say nothing certain about the ancestors of Jesus.
And not even the birth of Jesus Christ has survived. The two gospels that make this data call, two different historical fixed points that are apart but at least a decade.
It gets better: We not only have no (reasonable) idea when Jesus might have lived, we know not where. Yes, where did the actually come from, this Jesus of Nazareth?
There is no reason that it has in the first century really been a city. Speaking against it just not as bad is likely that not all small town (at least they should have had a synagogue) in a fairly small area is simply lost. Throughout their existence, no one should have only briefly mentioned once somewhere? And then all will still remains have dissolved the city within a few decades spontaneously in air?
If there had been a historical Jesus, we knew nothing about his life. But perhaps the Biblical legends have not formed around the exploits of a historical Jesus, but whose teachings. To this point it goes in the next part of our "Jesus Myth" series.
One of these lessons we have already mentioned:
"26 If anyone comes to me and hate not his father, mother, wife, children, brothers, sisters, even his own life, which can not be my disciple. "
(Luke 14:26)
Until the next time you can already times a little practice to hate your family and your life from the soul - How does one become a good Christian man.
___________________________________________
SERIES: "THE MYTH OF JESUS"
[Part 1: The Invisible Man]
>> [Part 2: Life as God in Galilee]
[Part 3: Teaching / promises]
[Part 4: On the Shoulders of Giants]
[Part 5: Deconstruction]
[PART 1: "The invisible man"]
tell you that he was the son of God. Others believe Jesus Christ to have a rabbi, whose lives have to be formed later legends.
But what was really at that time? Was Jesus God or man?
but sometimes we play both versions one by one and see how these two theories are plausible.
SAY WHAT?
Jesus said to have come to spread a divine message, the legend. But he behaved not as clever as you might expect from an omniscient God. He would just have to say anything then no one could know. He would have - at least for later generations - left a convincing proof of his divinity.
But his alleged statements contain nothing that would not have a normal human being 2000 years ago can tell. God insists in his new revelation on his view that the earth is flat (eg, Luke 4:5, Revelation 7:1, Hebrews 1:10).
The earth is not flat and not the center of the universe, it is several billion years old and revolves around the sun, which is of a trillion stars. If Jesus would have said something like - What did the damn skeptical, rational's Pagans for eyes made if a statement would have the Bible can be proven scientifically later!
But no, it spreads rather that people who are sick, blind or disabled, possessed by "demons" and "devils" and that it is healthy when one prays them hard enough. Thus, he advanced the then-medicine for 0 years!
Suppose Jesus was God come, and to spread the message of his love on earth.
it finds that it was successful? If he had as an omnipotent God can not people reveal all of the world? Or at least a majority of the people?
are today at least two thirds of the world is not Christian. And while Christianity is everywhere in our region at least in the past, there are many regions of the world where that was not Sun
Let's say God has changed and is now a loving God and not, as before in the Old Testament, a racist who says a certain group of people consider to be sacred and the others. Why he appears in only part of the world in which he had always always been? He wants to be but now instead of just "God of the Israelites," "God of all."
God it was probably better to show only specific people and the way to reveal himself with miracles, for which there are no more witnesses There. And we, the 99.99 ..% of humanity in the history of the so-must believe without miracles?
It does not look as if it was the divine purpose to reveal Himself to all people. Since there'd better's methods. He is God. Equipped with omnipotence, he should manage a halfway decent job. But maybe he wants to reveal not only yes, but the people do something good, because he so loves.
THANK GOD
"16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have eternal life .
17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. "
(John 3:16-17)
Had the son of a loving God is the life of mankind can not improve something obvious?
If our creator could have explained to us, for example, that many diseases caused by poor hygiene be caused (rather than by "vicious", as Jesus says) - can be saved How many millions of lives would have in the past 2000 years
Jesus says, however, exactly? the opposite. He washed it not so with the hands, as we learn in an episode from the Gospel of Matthew (Chapter 15 ). This
come to Jesus and the Pharisees complain that he and his disciples do not wash their hands before eating. Jesus is angry and foul is called the Pharisees hypocrites.
His argument: he washes his hands, perhaps not, the Pharisees rocky but not people who have insulted their parents - which is more serious ...
He comes to the conclusion:
"20 but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile the man." (Matthew 15:20)
But, Jesus, you genius!
WHY YOU SEND ME IN HELL (hell, hell)?
"God is Love"
(1 John 4:8)
God is love and therefore kill his child for us. Thus we
In the Old Testament makes no mention of hell or something similar. Satan there is no ruler of a world full of eternal torment, but keeps (- as we learn in the book of Job -) either on earth or in heaven, in the midst of God's children and the old gentleman.
Only Christ is the idea of eternal punishment after death.
The Old Testament again and again reported sinners, punished by God for their sins directly (and usually kills).
As people but also at that time were not completely stupid, for it would have at some point realized that it is not. Religion needed something new, bigger, to the people and spreading fear.
God kills you immediately, if you sin: Everyone knows from personal experience.
But if the punishment only comes after death, where they can look stupid as any other ...
You are not even a murderer or child molester must. According to Jesus you will go to hell when his brother a "fool" is the name (Matthew 5:22) or insulted the Holy Spirit. In the latter case, a forgiveness of that sin the way, is excluded from the beginning (Mark 3:29, Matthew 12:32). Could This Be Love? ..
NO WONDER
But now, take me, Jesus Christ would have been a normal man, no God, or the like.
A wise rabbi who went about preaching was baptized, told parables, and is added to later legends developed. Most non-religious people can make friends well with this view. But if you take all the miracles of Jesus, biblical biography, then you have already found the historical Jesus?
is so easy, unfortunately not. First, drop off quite a bit of important events that have shaped the character Jesus Christ prevail.
For example:
- The announcement of his birth by an angel
- The Birth of the Virgin Maria
- The star of Bethlehem
- The Birth of the "holy spirit" in the form of a dove at Jesus' baptism
- Satan tries to Jesus in the desert
- Angel "serve" Jesus in the desert
- Apostle to me nothing are you anything everything and leave to follow Jesus that they have just met just
- Jesus spits a blind man's eyes, whereupon he can see again
- The expulsion of "Devils"
- The feeding of the 5000
- The power of the 4000
- Jesus cursed a fig tree because This does not bear fruit (seriously)
- The Transfiguration (Jesus takes two apostles on a mountain begins to light up like crazy and float, appear Moses and Elijah and more nonsense of this kind)
- Jesus Devil conjures up on his desire for men into a herd of pigs, which then fall off a cliff and all die.
- The re-awakening of the dead
- Jesus makes a storm to disappear
- dozens of miracle cures
- Jesus runs on water
- The Apostle Peter is asked by Jesus to catch a fish in whose mouth are a coin for their stamp tax should. Prompt
happened just that - turning water into wine
- Jesus predicted that Judas betrays him and slandered him Peter and
- The Resurrection
TAUFTOUR
What remains? A few acts, places and names that say something about the historical Christ.
His mother should have been called Mary, he should have lived in Nazareth, a carpenter who worked and been baptized by John the Baptist be. But are reliable biographical information?
Let's start with John the Baptist. About which there are historical records, for example, the Jewish historian Josephus, who reports to John as a Jewish rebel, Jesus mentioned in this report but not a word.
to this but according to the Gospels, John have recognized the divinity of Christ and worshiped him. If that were true, that would have meant John followers would spontaneously become Christians, but recognize when their cult leader a man as God's son.
"29 The next day John saw Jesus coming to him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which bears the sins of the world [...]
34 ! And I saw it bare record, that this is God's Son. "
(John 1:29, 34)
But there are no reports or other reports on trailer a Jesus Christ from the first half of the first century, while supporters of John Taufbewegung are occupied.
MARIA JESUS!
What we know about the family of Jesus?
learn the earliest Gospel of Mark we hardly know anything about Joseph and Mary. Nothing about a virgin birth or the prophecy through an angel.
The story begins with John the Baptist. The family of Jesus first appeared on the third chapter, where Jesus denied his still nameless brothers and his mother and called in a good cult leader, his followers as the true family style.
"31 And there was his mother and his brothers stood outside and sent to him and called him.
32 And the people sat around him. And They said to him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren without seek for thee
33 And he answered them and said. Who is my mother and my brothers?
34 And he looked round about on the disciples, who sat in a circle, and said, Behold my mother and my brothers
35 For whoever does the will of God, who is my brother and my sister and my mother ".
(Mark 3:31-35)
throughout Mark's Gospel, Mary's name is mentioned only once, as is Jesus' son of Mary ". Much more we learn about Maria here .
is not only in the later Gospels of Matthew and Luke to the Virgin Mary in Luke's Gospel, she also meets an angel in a dream -. appears in Matthew the angel but her husband Joseph.
In John's Gospel, Jesus is with his mother at a wedding party. She asks him for a favor, after which Jesus asks his mother what he had really to do with her.
"1 And on the third day was a marriage in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there
2 Jesus and his. disciples were also invited to the wedding.
3 And since there was Gebrach wine, the mother of Jesus saith unto him, They have no wine.
4 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, what have I to do with you? My hour has not yet come. "
(John 2:1-4)
Otherwise we know nothing about the Virgin Mary. Jesus seems to have not particularly liked. He denied and insulted his mother and recommends to his followers the same.
"26 If anyone comes to me and hate not his father, mother, wife, children, brothers, Sisters, even his own life that can not be my disciple. "
(Luke 14:26)
SAINT MARY
Maria then later acquired more prominence. In the 2nd century writings of several biographies for they invented. is It also reports the Assumption of Mary, to be published in the Gospels said nothing. Although the church such documents are not recorded in the canon, they said at the Assumption a dogma. one doubts a dogma that you can out of the church be thrown. Even if this dogma has no reference to the texts of the Bible. What the Church is always the truth, even when it is complete nonsense.
Another dogma Maria explained later to the eternal virgin. Jesus brothers and sisters who are mentioned in the Gospels, are now suddenly supposed to only "cousins". And who does not believe will not be saved. Among Catholics
is the worship of Mary to the point that many of them not only to keep the mother of Jesus, but for the "Mother of God."
suspects to a historical Maria, one must also remove it from the notes of everything supernatural. In the first written Gospel of Mark, however, is nothing unusual about her, said nothing about their virginity or the announcement of his birth by an angel. This is a story that was not written later.
(or earlier, but in other religions, but this in a later part of this series more.)
that remains is the fact that she was said to be married to Joseph and their children to have lived in Nazareth. True because at least that?
HE'S A REAL NOWHERE MAN, SITTING IN HIS NOWHERE LAND
The city of Nazareth for the first time in the Gospels (between 70-110 AD) mentioned in writing.
Not in the Old Testament and other writings to the year 70, not in Josephus, the Jewish historian from the late 1st Century, or his historian colleagues.
This is the territory of the former province of Galilee puny and was about 10% of the area of today's Netherlands. The Talmud - extensive accentuation of the Hebrews at the beginning of the 1st Millennium have been posted - lists in this area over 40 cities, even Josephus 65th One of them (the city "Japha") is located only 1.5 miles from the present-day Nazareth.
Even Paul, whose letters were written earlier than the Gospels mentioned in his writings, no city Nazareth. It is also not a single map from the lifetime of Jesus or received against the Nazareth was recorded.
In the fourth century traveled Helena, the mother of Constantine, the Christian emperor of Rome, the Holy Land to find the home of their Saviour Jesus Christ. What they found was not very spectacular. A single well, nothing else. Here is two hundred years have previously been a city large enough that they had a synagogue, is said to have taught in the Bible according to Jesus?
As locals from the region of the mother of the Emperor insured, however, have made this well, the Virgin Mary drew water, Helena built a church at this point. Also in the vicinity of a cave, said to have lived in the family of God, they built a church.
Thanks to the two churches was something that was previously only a well and a cave, now a pilgrimage site "Nazareth".
Man eagerly conducted excavations in order to win even more sacred relics. The only thing we found were a few graves. In the Hebrew culture of the time but they buried their dead away from the settlements, because deaths were considered unclean. That makes it even more unlikely that there the "Nazareth" to the Gospels was located. Most likely, people were buried there from surrounding towns, for example, from the nearby Japha.
As Christianity spread, attracted more and more believers, the pilgrimage site and slowly grew into a city. Today, Nazareth has about 65,000 inhabitants.
But that in the first century AD a town called Nazareth did exist, is extremely unlikely. Since no written records or archaeological evidence suggest it can be assumed that Nazareth is just as real as Duckburg, Taka-Tuka-Land, or Gotham City.
Other geographical information about Jesus' life are dubious. In Luke's Gospel reports that Jesus was supposedly born in Bethlehem because a census was carried out under Quirinius. In fact, there was a census under Quirinius in 6 AD
It had no means everyone in his hometown return, as reported in the Bible. The Romans were among the people where so just stayed, and prevented thus ironically a collapse of infrastructure and the outbreak of anarchy.
According to St. Matthew's Gospel finds King Herod (73-4 BC), that a chosen one is born. Because he fears, the holy child could be a danger to him, he decides to have killed all the children in Israel in two years. So Mary and Joseph flee to Egypt with Jesus.
should in fact such a million times the mass murder hardly have taken place without the traditions of which exist. But this is not the Sun . The event is not even mentioned in any of the other Gospels only in passing. The historian Josephus, who wrote a comprehensive biography of Herod mentioned nothing of the sort.
HEY, JOE
also about Jesus' alleged adoptive father Joseph not historical information are delivered. The New Testament gives his profession that Jesus takes over later, with the Greek word "Tekton".
This word was used incorrectly translated as "carpenter." The true but not exactly the case. A Tekton was probably a simple laborer who has done this time and the times. Also with wood tecton have worked, but not only or mainly. It was a profession in the social hierarchy at that time very stood down.
According to the genealogies in Matthew and Luke is Joseph but from the biblical King David (which it probably was not). Although King David is one of the most revered figures in the Old Testament, and there is also a Saviour is announced, which is to be an ancestor of David, there are extensive Hebrew records not a single tree that Josef included - either as a descendant of David, yet as the (adoptive) father of Jesus Christ.
The twelve apostles and the twelve disciples are not historically verifiable. According to the traditions of the Gospels, Jesus had twelve loyal followers. After Jesus' death are eleven of them to Apostles have been called - Judas was not the party.
because 12 more than 11 sounds, we still got a new guy on board. The task of the apostles should be to spread the message of Jesus' deeds and his teachings.
And how did they do that?
Not at all. The traditional biblical studies assumed that two of the apostles have written gospels, namely Matthew and John. As go these days but even the vast majority of the Christian Bible researchers assume that these gospels may be derived from the apostles, one can suppose that is true.
is from any of the twelve men allegedly received anything, no writings of them, nor reports about them, not even a tiny little side note.
there was no historical Jesus is, it's not surprising that he was no twelve disciples and apostles. But if it is a historical Jesus have been, created a movement that was to conquer half the world, he needed it most likely a few more than twelve disciples.
GOD OR NOT
should have if a historical Jesus Christ exists, we know nothing about his life.
Taking everything supernatural, all the wonders of the reports of the Gospels remains low. And even that little is historically dubious.
The most important information to identify a man this time clearly are his ancestors and his birthplace. About Jesus' ancestors, we know nothing. In the Bible two different pedigrees are handed down. Since they contain the Jewish faith extremely important figures such as Adam, Abraham, Isaac and King David's voice, both not very likely. But even if one would correspond to the two family trees of the truth, we still do not know which one. We can therefore say nothing certain about the ancestors of Jesus.
And not even the birth of Jesus Christ has survived. The two gospels that make this data call, two different historical fixed points that are apart but at least a decade.
It gets better: We not only have no (reasonable) idea when Jesus might have lived, we know not where. Yes, where did the actually come from, this Jesus of Nazareth?
There is no reason that it has in the first century really been a city. Speaking against it just not as bad is likely that not all small town (at least they should have had a synagogue) in a fairly small area is simply lost. Throughout their existence, no one should have only briefly mentioned once somewhere? And then all will still remains have dissolved the city within a few decades spontaneously in air?
If there had been a historical Jesus, we knew nothing about his life. But perhaps the Biblical legends have not formed around the exploits of a historical Jesus, but whose teachings. To this point it goes in the next part of our "Jesus Myth" series.
One of these lessons we have already mentioned:
"26 If anyone comes to me and hate not his father, mother, wife, children, brothers, sisters, even his own life, which can not be my disciple. "
(Luke 14:26)
Until the next time you can already times a little practice to hate your family and your life from the soul - How does one become a good Christian man.
___________________________________________
SERIES: "THE MYTH OF JESUS"
[Part 1: The Invisible Man]
>> [Part 2: Life as God in Galilee]
[Part 3: Teaching / promises]
[Part 4: On the Shoulders of Giants]
[Part 5: Deconstruction]
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Pamp Gold 100grm Bars
MYTH OF JESUS (Part 1: The invisible Man)
Many people believe in Jesus Christ. And even most of the unbelievers are sure that behind the Bible stories a real man, a historical Jesus of Nazareth.
But there really was ever such a man?
SON OF GOD
lived about two thousand years man, on both legends and historical facts have survived well. Myths tell that he was born of a virgin. Not only that, he even should have been son of a god.
The speech is of course of Octavian, who later became a Roman Kaiser took the name Augustus. His adoptive father Julius Caesar was the Roman Senate officially declared "God," as well as Augustus after his death years 14
the historical Jesus Christ would have been as to the eighteen years old this year. In
0 it can not be born, because Herod is mentioned in the Bible as the ruling king. And that is - as archeological discoveries prove - in 4 BEFORE Christ died.
About Augustus, there are numerous records obtained from his life. There are reports written by contemporaries and historians, by itself, there are archaeological writings Finds such as coins, statues and inscriptions, which show an undeniable mark in history. He was "only" Emperor of Rome.
Jesus is said to have brought about miracles, however. They were certainly not normal. He is said to have fed 5,000 people with a few loaves and fish (and it's even been what remained). A chapter later in the same gospel nor a feed of the reported 4000th The're at 9000 witnesses a miracle.
Jesus first miracle in John's Gospel is turning water into wine at a wedding party. As many as three times he brought witnesses before the dead back to life.
According to the Gospels, he will be far been around, in many done in public places, cities have miraculous healing and we have kept in front of large crowds sermons. Moreover
saw him supposedly several people - after he had already died. It must be noticed also.
As might be assumed that there were tons of written records from this period are accounts of Jesus miraculous deeds and spread his teachings. Or at least mention his name. Yet it is not so.
WHERE DOES IT WORK?
It not a single written word of Jesus is narrated in person. Not a syllable.
But not only that it spends the entire time, said to have lived in Jesus, not a single written record. Nowhere.
funny already.
The four Gospels of the Bible we know today were created after a period of four decades. The first was released but not before around 70 AD.
held in the forty years after Jesus' death, it said none of the apostles or anyone else bother to these exciting stories of the Son of God, or write his revolutionary views.
But all of a sudden booming Jesus stories. At that time there was at least equal to sixty Gospels.
was not until the fourth century, all books that are in today's Bible, for the first time in a compilation gathered. They opted for the Gospels of Mark, Luke, John and Matthew. These names, however, was only assigned later, the original author is not mentioned.
THE ALTERNATIVE BIBLE
before and afterwards but other stories about Jesus when Christians were well known.
Such as the Gospel of Thomas, which only contains quotes from Jesus. Here you can read it. A small taste:
" (14) Jesus said to them: If you fast, you will write you a sin and when you pray, you shall condemn be, and when you give alms, you will do evil in your mind. "
" (71) Jesus said: I will destroy this house, and nobody will be able to rebuild it. "
" (98) Jesus said: The kingdom of the Father is like a man who wanted to kill a great man. He moved into his house the sword and pierced the wall to find out whether his hand would be strong enough. Then he killed the nobles. "
(114) Simon Peter said to them: Mary should go away from our midst, because women are not worthy of life. Jesus said, Behold, I will pull them to make them male, so that it becomes a living spirit, comparable with you men. . For every woman who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven "
" (7) Jesus said: Blessed is the lion that eats the man and the lion become man, and cursed is the man the lion eats, and the lion become man. "
Have you seen this with the lions?" I do not. It is also interesting that Jesus forbids prayer.
were also there because, for example, nor the Gospel of Judas , Maria and many others.
I IS NOT AFRAID OF NO GHOST
with a selection of biographies of Jesus, the church some time, which revealed divine "truth" was and what is not. They justified their authority so that the "holy spirit" that inspired the Bible writers, was also in the selection of texts in the game.
How credible you can find - that an institution that claims to know, a divine revelation, this is due to the actions of a spirit that can not see nobody else except them - it was once found along.
AND OTHERS SO
are in the New Testament Gospels handed down next to the still earlier writings about Jesus. The letters of Paul, but draw a very different picture of Jesus. He is considered more spiritual, spectacular wonders of Paul loses nothing.
Nothing about the life of Christ, not a single literal tradition of Jesus we find in Paul's writings. Not told about the Blessed Virgin, the star of Bethlehem, Nazareth, Joseph, Mary, Judas, Pontius Pilate, John the Baptist, etc
In the Bible, that Paul should have known a person of the apostles, namely Peter, the supposed founder of the Church and the first pope (after switch Heaven's Gate). He should have told him nothing had become of all the wonders and sign of our man of God?
It is believed, however, that is the oldest text about Jesus, who has made it into the modern Bible, the Revelation of John. In the Book of Revelation, the last book of the Bible, it is the struggle between Jesus and the monster 666, the anti-Christ. The whole text is a surreal trip, in which Jesus appears only as a supernatural being. About one man, Jesus Christ, the book says nothing.
WHO'S YOUR DADDY?
In two of the Gospels, where family trees of Jesus. The conflict, however, obvious: They call not only various alleged ancestors, but also a different number of generations. Said Lukas calls 40, Matthew, but only 25 generations between Jesus and King David. Both family trees lead to Jesus Father Josef.
It is believed the Gospels of Luke and Matthew, Joseph was not the real father of Jesus, but God.
is the earliest Gospel of Mark of a virgin birth, however, no mention.
Not even in the oldest, probably caused by 110 AD, the Gospel of John. Two of the four officially recognized biographer of Christ found this detail probably not worth mentioning. It managed
example, a bizzare Episode in the Gospel of Mark where Jesus cursed a fig tree because of the (off season) bear any fruit. But not the virgin thing.
Should we really believe that Mark knew the author, that Jesus was a virgin mother at birth, it was not worth mentioning for his biography? Son of a virgin, who cares about that? ..
DO NOT FIT ...
Because the early Christians no reports on their beloved Jesus could be found in historical records, which they simply forged. As for Josephus Flavius, the Jewish-Roman historian. The was busted because they was rather clumsy and stupid as in the 4th Century first appeared - although the text is from the second century.
historians argue today about what Josephus originally from the year 93 AD, wrote it. They are united, however, that the now well-known text of Christians has long been manipulated after its publication.
Upcoming supposed references in the history originated from the 2nd Century AD. The Roman historian Suetonius wrote
120 AD, a Roman decree from the year 49: "The Jews, who stirred up by some Chrestos, continually incited unrest, sales he from Rome. "
" Christos "was then a common name for slaves and freed slaves, meaning" good. " Even if Jesus Christ had meant it occupies the highest, that in the beginning of the second century were people who believed in a Christ. The dispute, however, no one.
Darin to see a non-biblical evidence of the historical existence of Jesus Christ is risky. Or desperate.
There is a short passage about Jesus in the historian Tacitus, which is to date from 117th Which is however also not very controversial. Scientifically proven, however, that in the original document something about "chrestianos stand (trailer a "Christos") and was subsequently in "Christianos" (follower of Christ "corrected). That early Christians such forgeries were necessary for talks was not necessarily that Jesus is historically proven.
And even if Tacitus and Suetonius as "Christos" is actually the biblical "Jesus Christ" to mean, even if the fake site by Josephus in the original engineered passage mentions Christ, does not change anything from the fact that by the year 1992 to Christ is not a single passage in any historical records are - whether real or fake - which mention a Jesus Christ.
WILL NOT HAVE SEEN'S ...
"52 And the earth shook and the rocks rent, the graves were on, and were many bodies of the saints, because the slept
53 and came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city and appeared to many . "
(Matthew 27:52-53)
This is the Matthew Evagelium reports on the death of Jesus Christ.
Holy Zombies in Jerusalem? ..
That sounds not really like something that many decades No one writes down who has experienced something like time or has heard of credible witnesses.
Also there is no record of it that is supposed to have after the death of Jesus, allegedly the world according to the Bible not the sun shone for three days.
NO NAME
So there was a historical Jesus? No, there were even many Jesuses (Jesus's ?)...
from more than a half dozen Jesus - or wieauchimmer is the plural - there are written records. "Jesus" was no name, but a title. It means "God saves". Several leaders of Jewish rebels called themselves this time Jesus. Only our favorite Jesus of Nazareth, known from radio and television, which unfortunately is not it.
also "Christ" is a religious title that means "the anointed one." At that time, kings were not crowned, but anointed. (Think of Prince Charles at a time the world powers before anointing -. ... Fortunately, I'd rather not be abolished)
The Hebrew word for "Christ" is the way, "Messiah".
"Jesus Christ" is thus a (dual track). Like Santa Claus, Master of the Universe or Super Man The real name of Jesus we find nowhere else.
Jesus Christ is literally a no name.
STERN ON BETHLEHEM
From his life we learn from the biblical gospels of Jesus' birth, and only from the time of his baptism and his death (and beyond).
The famous Christmas story of Jesus' birth in Bethlehem appears in the earliest gospel (Mark) to not at all. Even the Gospel of John silent.
The first surviving reports of stable, manger, the Magi (in the Bible, however, neither kings nor referred to as three, but as a "way from the East"), Stern, frankincense, gold, etc. - you know the story - thus stem from the later Gospels, Luke and Matthew. Their time of origin was probably somewhere between 70 and 100 AD.
If this event had really taken place, it would be, as I said, not been in year 0.
In one of the Gospels mentions King Herod, who died at about 4 before our era, in another contrast, a large census, which, as we now know, occurred in year 6 AFTER Christ's alleged birth in the year 0 had. Between 64 and 104 years passed, then, until the story was written for the first time. This can hardly be an eye-witness account, in a time when the average life expectancy was about 30.
THE MAN WHO WAS NOT THERE
Jesus is a phantom. A man without a name, of whom nothing is handed down from his lifetime. Outside of religious texts, there is no evidence in the whole of the first century to Jesus Christ.
Even the earliest religious texts about the life of Jesus, several decades after his alleged death emerged.
from a mass of many such texts, which are contradictory in part elected, then, three hundred years later, the "holy spirit" those who are to reflect actual events. Although the four Gospels of the Bible are contradictory in part. It should be quite a dose of skepticism permitted times.
fasting must be considered one view: there is no evidence of a real Jesus Christ.
If only a fraction of the biblical stories about him is true, but you should expect at least a few references to its historical existence. There
Alternative explanations of the origin of the stories in the Gospels, but many: More about that in a later part of this series.
much to be said against a historical Jesus Christ, not help it. Except it wants very, very doll. This is called "faith."
___________________________________________
SERIES: "THE MYTH JESUS "
>> [Part 1: The Invisible Man]
[Part 2: Life as God in Galilee]
[Part 3: Administration / promises]
[Part 4: On the shoulders of giants]
[Part 5: Deconstruction]
Many people believe in Jesus Christ. And even most of the unbelievers are sure that behind the Bible stories a real man, a historical Jesus of Nazareth.
But there really was ever such a man?
SON OF GOD
lived about two thousand years man, on both legends and historical facts have survived well. Myths tell that he was born of a virgin. Not only that, he even should have been son of a god.
The speech is of course of Octavian, who later became a Roman Kaiser took the name Augustus. His adoptive father Julius Caesar was the Roman Senate officially declared "God," as well as Augustus after his death years 14
the historical Jesus Christ would have been as to the eighteen years old this year. In
0 it can not be born, because Herod is mentioned in the Bible as the ruling king. And that is - as archeological discoveries prove - in 4 BEFORE Christ died.
About Augustus, there are numerous records obtained from his life. There are reports written by contemporaries and historians, by itself, there are archaeological writings Finds such as coins, statues and inscriptions, which show an undeniable mark in history. He was "only" Emperor of Rome.
Jesus is said to have brought about miracles, however. They were certainly not normal. He is said to have fed 5,000 people with a few loaves and fish (and it's even been what remained). A chapter later in the same gospel nor a feed of the reported 4000th The're at 9000 witnesses a miracle.
Jesus first miracle in John's Gospel is turning water into wine at a wedding party. As many as three times he brought witnesses before the dead back to life.
According to the Gospels, he will be far been around, in many done in public places, cities have miraculous healing and we have kept in front of large crowds sermons. Moreover
saw him supposedly several people - after he had already died. It must be noticed also.
As might be assumed that there were tons of written records from this period are accounts of Jesus miraculous deeds and spread his teachings. Or at least mention his name. Yet it is not so.
WHERE DOES IT WORK?
It not a single written word of Jesus is narrated in person. Not a syllable.
But not only that it spends the entire time, said to have lived in Jesus, not a single written record. Nowhere.
funny already.
The four Gospels of the Bible we know today were created after a period of four decades. The first was released but not before around 70 AD.
held in the forty years after Jesus' death, it said none of the apostles or anyone else bother to these exciting stories of the Son of God, or write his revolutionary views.
But all of a sudden booming Jesus stories. At that time there was at least equal to sixty Gospels.
was not until the fourth century, all books that are in today's Bible, for the first time in a compilation gathered. They opted for the Gospels of Mark, Luke, John and Matthew. These names, however, was only assigned later, the original author is not mentioned.
THE ALTERNATIVE BIBLE
before and afterwards but other stories about Jesus when Christians were well known.
Such as the Gospel of Thomas, which only contains quotes from Jesus. Here you can read it. A small taste:
" (14) Jesus said to them: If you fast, you will write you a sin and when you pray, you shall condemn be, and when you give alms, you will do evil in your mind. "
" (71) Jesus said: I will destroy this house, and nobody will be able to rebuild it. "
" (98) Jesus said: The kingdom of the Father is like a man who wanted to kill a great man. He moved into his house the sword and pierced the wall to find out whether his hand would be strong enough. Then he killed the nobles. "
(114) Simon Peter said to them: Mary should go away from our midst, because women are not worthy of life. Jesus said, Behold, I will pull them to make them male, so that it becomes a living spirit, comparable with you men. . For every woman who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven "
" (7) Jesus said: Blessed is the lion that eats the man and the lion become man, and cursed is the man the lion eats, and the lion become man. "
Have you seen this with the lions?" I do not. It is also interesting that Jesus forbids prayer.
were also there because, for example, nor the Gospel of Judas , Maria and many others.
I IS NOT AFRAID OF NO GHOST
with a selection of biographies of Jesus, the church some time, which revealed divine "truth" was and what is not. They justified their authority so that the "holy spirit" that inspired the Bible writers, was also in the selection of texts in the game.
How credible you can find - that an institution that claims to know, a divine revelation, this is due to the actions of a spirit that can not see nobody else except them - it was once found along.
AND OTHERS SO
are in the New Testament Gospels handed down next to the still earlier writings about Jesus. The letters of Paul, but draw a very different picture of Jesus. He is considered more spiritual, spectacular wonders of Paul loses nothing.
Nothing about the life of Christ, not a single literal tradition of Jesus we find in Paul's writings. Not told about the Blessed Virgin, the star of Bethlehem, Nazareth, Joseph, Mary, Judas, Pontius Pilate, John the Baptist, etc
In the Bible, that Paul should have known a person of the apostles, namely Peter, the supposed founder of the Church and the first pope (after switch Heaven's Gate). He should have told him nothing had become of all the wonders and sign of our man of God?
It is believed, however, that is the oldest text about Jesus, who has made it into the modern Bible, the Revelation of John. In the Book of Revelation, the last book of the Bible, it is the struggle between Jesus and the monster 666, the anti-Christ. The whole text is a surreal trip, in which Jesus appears only as a supernatural being. About one man, Jesus Christ, the book says nothing.
WHO'S YOUR DADDY?
In two of the Gospels, where family trees of Jesus. The conflict, however, obvious: They call not only various alleged ancestors, but also a different number of generations. Said Lukas calls 40, Matthew, but only 25 generations between Jesus and King David. Both family trees lead to Jesus Father Josef.
It is believed the Gospels of Luke and Matthew, Joseph was not the real father of Jesus, but God.
is the earliest Gospel of Mark of a virgin birth, however, no mention.
Not even in the oldest, probably caused by 110 AD, the Gospel of John. Two of the four officially recognized biographer of Christ found this detail probably not worth mentioning. It managed
example, a bizzare Episode in the Gospel of Mark where Jesus cursed a fig tree because of the (off season) bear any fruit. But not the virgin thing.
Should we really believe that Mark knew the author, that Jesus was a virgin mother at birth, it was not worth mentioning for his biography? Son of a virgin, who cares about that? ..
DO NOT FIT ...
Because the early Christians no reports on their beloved Jesus could be found in historical records, which they simply forged. As for Josephus Flavius, the Jewish-Roman historian. The was busted because they was rather clumsy and stupid as in the 4th Century first appeared - although the text is from the second century.
historians argue today about what Josephus originally from the year 93 AD, wrote it. They are united, however, that the now well-known text of Christians has long been manipulated after its publication.
Upcoming supposed references in the history originated from the 2nd Century AD. The Roman historian Suetonius wrote
120 AD, a Roman decree from the year 49: "The Jews, who stirred up by some Chrestos, continually incited unrest, sales he from Rome. "
" Christos "was then a common name for slaves and freed slaves, meaning" good. " Even if Jesus Christ had meant it occupies the highest, that in the beginning of the second century were people who believed in a Christ. The dispute, however, no one.
Darin to see a non-biblical evidence of the historical existence of Jesus Christ is risky. Or desperate.
There is a short passage about Jesus in the historian Tacitus, which is to date from 117th Which is however also not very controversial. Scientifically proven, however, that in the original document something about "chrestianos stand (trailer a "Christos") and was subsequently in "Christianos" (follower of Christ "corrected). That early Christians such forgeries were necessary for talks was not necessarily that Jesus is historically proven.
And even if Tacitus and Suetonius as "Christos" is actually the biblical "Jesus Christ" to mean, even if the fake site by Josephus in the original engineered passage mentions Christ, does not change anything from the fact that by the year 1992 to Christ is not a single passage in any historical records are - whether real or fake - which mention a Jesus Christ.
WILL NOT HAVE SEEN'S ...
"52 And the earth shook and the rocks rent, the graves were on, and were many bodies of the saints, because the slept
53 and came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city and appeared to many . "
(Matthew 27:52-53)
This is the Matthew Evagelium reports on the death of Jesus Christ.
Holy Zombies in Jerusalem? ..
That sounds not really like something that many decades No one writes down who has experienced something like time or has heard of credible witnesses.
Also there is no record of it that is supposed to have after the death of Jesus, allegedly the world according to the Bible not the sun shone for three days.
NO NAME
So there was a historical Jesus? No, there were even many Jesuses (Jesus's ?)...
from more than a half dozen Jesus - or wieauchimmer is the plural - there are written records. "Jesus" was no name, but a title. It means "God saves". Several leaders of Jewish rebels called themselves this time Jesus. Only our favorite Jesus of Nazareth, known from radio and television, which unfortunately is not it.
also "Christ" is a religious title that means "the anointed one." At that time, kings were not crowned, but anointed. (Think of Prince Charles at a time the world powers before anointing -. ... Fortunately, I'd rather not be abolished)
The Hebrew word for "Christ" is the way, "Messiah".
"Jesus Christ" is thus a (dual track). Like Santa Claus, Master of the Universe or Super Man The real name of Jesus we find nowhere else.
Jesus Christ is literally a no name.
STERN ON BETHLEHEM
From his life we learn from the biblical gospels of Jesus' birth, and only from the time of his baptism and his death (and beyond).
The famous Christmas story of Jesus' birth in Bethlehem appears in the earliest gospel (Mark) to not at all. Even the Gospel of John silent.
The first surviving reports of stable, manger, the Magi (in the Bible, however, neither kings nor referred to as three, but as a "way from the East"), Stern, frankincense, gold, etc. - you know the story - thus stem from the later Gospels, Luke and Matthew. Their time of origin was probably somewhere between 70 and 100 AD.
If this event had really taken place, it would be, as I said, not been in year 0.
In one of the Gospels mentions King Herod, who died at about 4 before our era, in another contrast, a large census, which, as we now know, occurred in year 6 AFTER Christ's alleged birth in the year 0 had. Between 64 and 104 years passed, then, until the story was written for the first time. This can hardly be an eye-witness account, in a time when the average life expectancy was about 30.
THE MAN WHO WAS NOT THERE
Jesus is a phantom. A man without a name, of whom nothing is handed down from his lifetime. Outside of religious texts, there is no evidence in the whole of the first century to Jesus Christ.
Even the earliest religious texts about the life of Jesus, several decades after his alleged death emerged.
from a mass of many such texts, which are contradictory in part elected, then, three hundred years later, the "holy spirit" those who are to reflect actual events. Although the four Gospels of the Bible are contradictory in part. It should be quite a dose of skepticism permitted times.
fasting must be considered one view: there is no evidence of a real Jesus Christ.
If only a fraction of the biblical stories about him is true, but you should expect at least a few references to its historical existence. There
Alternative explanations of the origin of the stories in the Gospels, but many: More about that in a later part of this series.
much to be said against a historical Jesus Christ, not help it. Except it wants very, very doll. This is called "faith."
___________________________________________
SERIES: "THE MYTH JESUS "
>> [Part 1: The Invisible Man]
[Part 2: Life as God in Galilee]
[Part 3: Administration / promises]
[Part 4: On the shoulders of giants]
[Part 5: Deconstruction]
Saturday, July 3, 2010
E133 Error Baxi Boiler
DEUS EX MACHINA (or: Hex-Hex)
Christians often exaggerate when they speak of their beloved God. he ought to be omnipotent, omniscient and yet this also, of course, good-looking.
Unfortunately, these people forget sheer enthusiasm to match the unrealistic expectations of their God to reality and think the matter even to the end.
start but we still at the beginning.
WHERE IS THE TIME BEEN?
" a the beginning God created heaven and earth." (Genesis 1:1)
So begins the Bible. In the beginning God creates and earth. Later we learn that he also everything else, the lack of 99.99999 ... % of the universe has created. , At the beginning. But at the beginning of a mission?
Many Christians would probably answer: Well, on top of it all! And what was
before that? Well, nüscht, says the Christian, God created the time just so there was no before.
As you can imagine it actually mean time created? Creating means yes, something that God arise, that it was not previously existed. The concept of creation is only in the time dimension makes sense (and only forward in time). You need a point A, where something does not exist and a point B, where it exists. Only when A and B together, in that order, one may make sense to speak of a creation.
order to create time, we need a time when there is no time. To make time, we must already have the time. But if we have time, we need not make them anymore.
Nothing comes from nothing
"3 By faith we realize that the world is done by God's word is that everything what you see, is made of things. "
(Hebrews 11:3)
That God created the universe from "nothing" has, is also again so popular among Christians, but unfortunately not very well thought-out concept.
"nothing" but the invariable lack of of existence: Where that is is not nothing. But where should the "nothing" came from, but everything from God is what has made?
Before the creation there was supposedly no time. Only God. But God is not nothing!
(And if they can not recreate it so the world and then have written a book about it.)
So there has been always "something" (God first, God and creation) and never "nothing", the ingredient of "everything".
You could take the view that God has the universe not from "nothing", but made out of himself and the whole universe is thus a part of God. Then one is whether you know it or not, much closer to Hinduism than Christianity and therefore burn after death for all eternity in hell.
ALL POWER TO THE GOD
One of the major beliefs of Christians (and Jews and Muslims) is the omnipotence of God. Omnipotence means he can do EVERYTHING. But he can not create door, which he can not even open!
Can he still? Then is not omnipotent, if he can not even open a door silly.
lies he can not incidentally, is at least in the Bible (Hebrews 6:18). The Almighty is not something that almost everyone since kindergarten every day problems does.
But where is the problem, it could be argued as God fan. Maybe he can just about anything. At least he has created the universe, that's also what. Where's the problem?
Well, if God is anything, no matter how insignificant, can not, there are rules, laws, to consider themselves the Lord must. There would be a higher power. Since God, by definition, even the supreme power, I can not agree what so right.
WHAT HE DOES NOT KNOW HIM NOT HOT
God is said to be not only powerful but also omniscient. Say the believers. How do they know that? God has told them in the Bible and therefore must it right, because God knows everything.
But how does God that he knows everything? If he did not know something, how he knew it?
But take us assume that he knew everything. All this means he knows the future, knows all events that will shape your life, every decision you will make. Good night, free will ...
one accepts this, but it is meaningless to talk about things like responsibility and guilt. It comes, as it had to and you can just do nothing about it.
The world view of the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam), however, based on the principle of responsibility to God. God gave us an apparently free will. Although he punishes sin, but is forcing anyone to sin.
(Free) will and an omniscient God are mutually exclusive. If God is omniscient, so I can not go against my blasphemous lifestyle. For me to send to hell would be unfair. And this alleged God is supposed to be just.
If God is not omniscient, why should I worship the idiot then?
Christians often exaggerate when they speak of their beloved God. he ought to be omnipotent, omniscient and yet this also, of course, good-looking.
Unfortunately, these people forget sheer enthusiasm to match the unrealistic expectations of their God to reality and think the matter even to the end.
start but we still at the beginning.
WHERE IS THE TIME BEEN?
" a the beginning God created heaven and earth." (Genesis 1:1)
So begins the Bible. In the beginning God creates and earth. Later we learn that he also everything else, the lack of 99.99999 ... % of the universe has created. , At the beginning. But at the beginning of a mission?
Many Christians would probably answer: Well, on top of it all! And what was
before that? Well, nüscht, says the Christian, God created the time just so there was no before.
As you can imagine it actually mean time created? Creating means yes, something that God arise, that it was not previously existed. The concept of creation is only in the time dimension makes sense (and only forward in time). You need a point A, where something does not exist and a point B, where it exists. Only when A and B together, in that order, one may make sense to speak of a creation.
order to create time, we need a time when there is no time. To make time, we must already have the time. But if we have time, we need not make them anymore.
Nothing comes from nothing
"3 By faith we realize that the world is done by God's word is that everything what you see, is made of things. "
(Hebrews 11:3)
That God created the universe from "nothing" has, is also again so popular among Christians, but unfortunately not very well thought-out concept.
"nothing" but the invariable lack of of existence: Where that is is not nothing. But where should the "nothing" came from, but everything from God is what has made?
Before the creation there was supposedly no time. Only God. But God is not nothing!
(And if they can not recreate it so the world and then have written a book about it.)
So there has been always "something" (God first, God and creation) and never "nothing", the ingredient of "everything".
You could take the view that God has the universe not from "nothing", but made out of himself and the whole universe is thus a part of God. Then one is whether you know it or not, much closer to Hinduism than Christianity and therefore burn after death for all eternity in hell.
ALL POWER TO THE GOD
One of the major beliefs of Christians (and Jews and Muslims) is the omnipotence of God. Omnipotence means he can do EVERYTHING. But he can not create door, which he can not even open!
Can he still? Then is not omnipotent, if he can not even open a door silly.
lies he can not incidentally, is at least in the Bible (Hebrews 6:18). The Almighty is not something that almost everyone since kindergarten every day problems does.
But where is the problem, it could be argued as God fan. Maybe he can just about anything. At least he has created the universe, that's also what. Where's the problem?
Well, if God is anything, no matter how insignificant, can not, there are rules, laws, to consider themselves the Lord must. There would be a higher power. Since God, by definition, even the supreme power, I can not agree what so right.
WHAT HE DOES NOT KNOW HIM NOT HOT
God is said to be not only powerful but also omniscient. Say the believers. How do they know that? God has told them in the Bible and therefore must it right, because God knows everything.
But how does God that he knows everything? If he did not know something, how he knew it?
But take us assume that he knew everything. All this means he knows the future, knows all events that will shape your life, every decision you will make. Good night, free will ...
one accepts this, but it is meaningless to talk about things like responsibility and guilt. It comes, as it had to and you can just do nothing about it.
The world view of the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam), however, based on the principle of responsibility to God. God gave us an apparently free will. Although he punishes sin, but is forcing anyone to sin.
(Free) will and an omniscient God are mutually exclusive. If God is omniscient, so I can not go against my blasphemous lifestyle. For me to send to hell would be unfair. And this alleged God is supposed to be just.
If God is not omniscient, why should I worship the idiot then?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)